Walking on the Moon

Engineering Infinity is a collection of recent hard SF short stories edited by Jonathan Strahan.  Strahan does a fine job keeping things hard – which is to say stories that turn on current scientific ideas – without making them heartless or humorless.  Overall this is an excellent selection of stories that encourage thought about old tropes in new ways, which is one of the reasons I enjoy SF.

I should say that I grabbed this collection out of a desire to recapture the fun of spending a rainy day or long car trip sampling cool short stories.  For my money SF is the best genre for this kind of thing, because any story has the chance to turn your assumptions on their head.  In a collection like this, if the one you are reading now does not make your ideas flip, the next one will be right along.

By that metric, this collection was a smashing success.  There was a wide range of ideas and writing styles on display, many of them to my taste.  Even the stories I didn’t like were clearly trying something interesting, even when I did not think they succeeded.  Some clung more closely to genre conventions, but it was rare that a story in here did not offer some new twist.  It is to Strahan’s credit that the topics and tones do not overlap much at all.  This is a great sampler.

As I say, there was much to like in here.  My top three were “Bit Rot” from Charles Stross, “Malak” from Peter Watts, and “The Birds and the Bees and the Gasoline Trees” by John Barnes.  The last was particularly successful in throwing ideas out at a rate that well exceeded the length of the story.  And if you don’t want to read a story with that title, I’m not sure I want to talk to you.

If one of your ideas of fun is sitting down to gobble up short blasts of adventurous writing on hard SF kinds of topics, this is a good collection.

Recommended.

James Randi’s The Faith Healers is pretty much a seminal work in debunking.  Randi is one of the first, if not the first, to take a serious look at these people who travel from place to place claiming to heal the sick through faith for money.  Randi and his team do a great job running down the evidence on how these guys operate and often spectacularly beating them at their own game.  These faith healers are clearly just ripping people off and it’s great to see them called on it.

All that said, there are some problems with The Faith Healers.  The biggest one is that it is a victim of its own success.  In 1987 when The Faith Healers was published, most of these techniques were unknown by people outside the “trade” and their brazenness and  sophistication was surprising.  Today a lot of this work has become much more widely known.  It was a bombshell that these faith healers were using two-way radios during performances; now it’s a plot point on Leverage.  There are lots of other places for someone of a skeptical bent to find this information these days.

While I love the good works that James Randi has done – this book included – I will say that I didn’t find him a gripping writer.  All the facts are here and the information is clear, but he does not have the flair for narration that makes it exciting.  When one is presenting surprising truth, that is not a great limitation in an author.  Combined with the fact that I knew most of the raw information in here from other sources, it made the book something of a slog.

As I say, The Faith Healers is a victim of its own success.  Its success comes from the fact that it is clear, accessible, extremely thorough, and convincing.  If you have never looked into how faith healers operate, or why you should care that they are not on the up and up, this is a great book to read.  As a template for how to lay out an investigative work, it is sound.

I am amazed how different Kurt Vonnegut’s books can be while remaining Vonnegut books.  Cat’s Cradle has a unique tone and focus among his work, but it is difficult to imagine a reader believing that anyone else wrote it.

Cradle has a lot to say about religion, science, government and how they all interact as constructs of the complex humans who create them.  The water is deep there, but the environment is plenty warm.  While Vonnegut calls out the follies and inconsistencies of people and their intellectual constructs, he is always wryly affectionate to the individual people – or their fictional equivalents.

This is the work from which Vonnegut’s calypso-themed Bokononism religion appears, and is one of the key characters.  The religion gives him plenty to say about how they start and perpetuate themselves, but his genius is in making it simultaneously inviting.  A semi-nihilistic Caribbean religion with pidgin calypso hymns sounds pretty good.  No matter how calculated and ridiculous Bokononism sounds at times in the book, the underlying attractiveness of it takes some of the teeth out of the satire.  That warm feeling goes a long way.

It also contains a Memorial Day speech that is every bit as powerful as Mark Twain’s The War Prayer, while remaining respectful of the valor of young soldiers.  Vonnegut manages to scorch the men who lead young men to war while still lauding their spirit.  It is a remarkable piece of writing, and worth reading even if the rest of Cradle is not for you.

Overall an interesting work that walks a tightrope between satire and warmth.

Strongly Recommended.

This is Jon Krakauer’s critique of Greg Mortenson’s biographical works and charity.  His claims are serious: that Mortenson made up significant parts of his books, Three Cups of Tea and Stones to Schools, and that he has misappropriated significant funds intended for his non-profit charity, the Central Asian Institute (CAI). Krakauer also believes that much of the work that CAI has done has been mismanaged, resulting in unused buildings rather than the functioning schools that the CAI claims.

The situation is ugly.  Mortenson has sold a lot of books and raised a lot of money for the wholly laudable goal of building schools in the disadvantaged world.  Until these allegations were raised by Krakauer and 60 Minutes, he was well respected.  It is difficult for a random reader to assess the veracity of either author’s claims.

And yet.

My gut feeling is that Krakauer is probably right about the inflated claims in Three Cups of Tea.  I said in my earlier review that Three Cups is breathless in places, and that’s an understatement.  Much of that book feels overwrought and the narrative just too overheated to be true. If that was the extent of the allegations, I would be disappointed, but a few white lies to build schools for the disadvantaged is not the worst sin.

Krakauer goes on to say that the CAI is basically being mismanaged to the point of fraud and that funds intended for those schools are not making it there.  Mortenson’s alleged mismanagement ranges from using CAI funds to advertise for his books (which do not directly benefit the CAI) to losing touch with the operations on the ground.  The latter manifests itself as not keeping the schools that have been built operating by training and supporting teachers.  Without them, the school is just another building.

As I say, I am not in a position to judge these claims – other than my literary assessment above.  However, Krakauer’s claims all seem testable, and I think that an audit of a multi-million dollar charity accused of such malfeasance is worthwhile.  One would hope that the CAI would be eager to use such an audit to clear their name.  With the attention this is getting, I suspect the audit is imminent.

I hope Krakauer’s wrong.  Mortenson’s story is compelling and inspiring, and I’d like to believe that he’s made people’s lives better.  I fear he’s right.

Erik Larson’s In the Garden of Beasts tells the story of key years in Hitler’s rise to power from the eyes of a US ambassador to Germany and his adventurous daughter.  Larson has a keen eye for exploring seminal events from unlikely perspectives, and it serves him well here.

His protagonist is an unlikely choice for ambassador.  William Dodd was a history professor who was looking for a sleepy assignment that would give him time to work on a book. Unexpectedly, due to widespread distaste for the posting and Roosevelt’s whim, he became ambassador to Germany in 1933.  Hitler is in power but still consolidating it.  German rhetoric is full of bluster and racism, people are beaten on German streets, yet everyone wants to believe that this will all blow over.

Dodd is a strange man to find in the middle of this.  In a clubby world of career diplomats he is a principled academic.  He guides himself by Jeffersonian principles of everyman’s democracy (and frugality), but finds that his aristocratic brethren are more interested in Germany’s bond payments than its human rights record.  While that somewhat overstates the case – no one could be completely blind to the regime’s violent attitudes – it is remarkable to see the range of opinions that people held.

While Dodd is something of a fish out of water his daughter Martha takes to the Berlin scene like it was meant for her.  She rubs elbows (and other parts) with correspondents, underground opponents of Hitler, Russian spies, and Nazi officials.  Her personal observations round out her father’s ethical ones to construct a lively picture of a turbulent time.

Larson’s choice to frame his history from the views of these outsiders gives his readers a frame of reference that is informed but still apart from the world he is describing.  This helps put the reader in the frame of mind needed to enter into early 1930’s Europe.  The uncertainty and misplaced hope for Hitler’s government look like blindness and folly from the other side of World War II, but at the time rational, intelligent people held those views.  Understanding why they did and how they were disabused of them helps understand our world, too.

The best framework would not be worth much without Larson’s eye for the telling detail and narrative flow.  It is a powerful skill to not construct a telling detail, but to winnow it from the piles of from  this widely researched time.  Larson demonstrates that ability again and again without losing the main thread of the narrative.

Garden is not flawless.  The sharp focus on his characters recedes after the harrowing Night of the Long Knives, but the book lingers on them longer than I expected. Even the ends of even minor players are described in detail.  History is messy, but trailing off is less powerful than ending.

Still, Larson shows a fascinating time from an illuminating angle.

Strongly Recommended.

Apparently Henry Ford has a Forgotten Jungle City.  This is the sort of fact that is impossible for me to ignore.  Fortunately it is also impossible for Greg Grandin to ignore and he has done plenty of excellent reserach to bring the whole story to readers of Fordlandia.

You have to give Grandin some credit for turning an odd obsession late in Ford’s life into a Forgotten Jungle City.  One could easily have looked at the situation and seen a footnote in Ford’s biography and moved on.  Grandin sees a grander tale, both in terms of the city’s story and how it reflects the attitudes of Ford and other US industrialists.

The history section of your local library or bookstore is full of stories of grand engineering feats, especially from this time. Most of those narratives have moments where the builders are fumbling around trying to figure out how to make their plan work, or finding the right people to implement it.  Several pieces fall together to make any of those projects succeed.  While reading Grandin’s story one keeps expecting that chapter where the right people and the right ideas cohere.  It doesn’t come.  Fordlandia never was a going concern.

Obviously there are a lot of failed projects, but Fordlandia sets itself apart because it was bold in both hubristic scope and conflicting ideals.  Those aspects reflect the personality and philosophy of Henry Ford, and Grandin spends much of the book exploring how it reflects Ford’s career and mindset.  That reflection shows a man of surprising contradictions and enormous influence over American thought and industry.  There are plenty of reasons to belive Grandin is accurate, and I was left with an interest in finding out more about Ford.

Overall Fordlandia is clear, well-written, and well supported.  There are a couple places where it feels slightly padded.  Grandin covers some very similar ground more than once, but it is not terribly distracting.  Overall it is an interesting story of a corner of history that reflects and magnifies its time.

Strongly Recommended.

Stormy Weather is a good deal of fun, but there are no surprises in here for a Carl Hiaasen fan.  That is not to say that the plot is predictable or that the characters are uninteresting.  They are Hiaasen characters: quirky without being outlandish, rougish without being trite.  Everyone is acting as people – sometimes bad people – will and Hiaasen hands out just desserts by the end.

The setting for this outing is the mid 1990’s immediately following one of the big hurricanes that devastated South Florida.  Hiaasen is less interested in the power of nature than the gang of opportunists and petty crooks that the event brings out of the woodwork.  He’s also interested in the forces of justice, such as they are, in the guise of his recurring ex-Florida Givernor turned unlikely vigilante  and some other folks he recruits.

The setting was a little jarring – it’s surprising how much has changed in 15 years – but a well preserved slice of the time.  And people are the same.

Recommended.

2:46 Aftershock is very much an artifact of its time, specifically it is an Internet-created anthology of short descriptions of the 11 Mar 2011 earthquake and its effect on the residents.  It is being sold to raise money for the Red Cross relief efforts.

It is a remarkable emotional collage of the reactions of these people to a seminal event in their lives.  Each entry is concise and evocative.  The topics range from how the author’s core values have survived a terrifying event, to thoughts about how the media served and didn’t serve the people, to whether an author would live in a high-rise again. Taken together, the pieces form a vivid snapshot of how a life-changing moment impinged on this community.

If I were to pick a nit, it would probably be that many of these pieces are from non-native Japanese.  But that would be a nit.  This book captures the reaction of this community, and its unfair to gripe about the composition of a group that produces a work of this power.

It is only fair to mention that one of my good friends, Rod Van Meter, is a contributor.

Strongly recommended.

There’s a lot going on in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, and I both learned a lot of facts and considered a lot of ideas from it.  I came away believing that it is just a little too scattered, and that a little more focus on a smaller topic set would make it more powerful.

Rebecca Skloot sets out to tell the story of the person from whom the longest running cultured cell line in cancer research was taken.  Along the way she talks about the research uses to which the cells have been put, the ethical quandries raised by taking those cells without permission, the increasing commercialization of cell lines for research and the rights of donors in them.  There’s also a theme of the different levels of care provided to poor and Black patients as compared to richer White patients, and the history of research hospitals exploiting those poor patients.  Sometimes that exploitation takes the form of actively infecting people with a disease to see the effect.  That causes an unsurprising suspicion from the poorer members of society.  One can understand the thinking: “if they don’t infect me with something, maybe they’ll only sell my cells.”

As if those weren’t enough Immortal Life also a biography of Henrietta Lacks, the narrative of how that biography was dug out of the distrusting community by our intrepid reporter, an investigation into the difficult straits of the Lacks extended family, and a buddy movie starring Lacks’s daughter and the reporter.

All that is presented in an involving way, and the development is clear and well organized.  That said, there are only so many changes of viewpoint and tone that a reader can take in a couple hundred pages.  There is too much to take in from too many perspectives.

The other side of that coin is that none of the topics receives the depth of coverage it deserves.  There’s a book in here about the exploitation of the poor by government research and the distrust and hatred it has bred.  There’s a discussion to be had about the state of the medical saftey net and services than can break cycles of abuse that are not being provided by our government and the human and financial toll that is taking.  There’s a history to tell about this specific family, its members, and in particular, Lacks’s daughter. And then there is the HeLa cell line from Henrietta, including all the scientific and ethical questions it raises.

Unfortunately, we get just the trailer versions of all that.  They are good trailers, but any one of those topics deserves the space to breathe and be explored in its entirety.

Despite my concerns, I think Immortal Life is worth reading.  It forms an interesting nexus between a lot of issues and ideas, and a reader may leave the book on a very different trajectory than they arrived at it from.

Recommended.

Sara Gruen’s Water for Elephants is an interesting story that’s well told.  I enjoyed reading it, and wanted to find out what happened to the characters.  The unusual setting is never offputting and adds flavor to the narrative. None of that is easy to do, and this is a well written novel.

I am not sure it is going to be a very memorable novel for me.  While I was engaged throughout, none of these characters captured my imagination or touched my heart.  I feel like everyone played their role well, but it all came out as a play, not an episode from life.

Some of that is probably the plotting.  The story certainly feels screenplay-ready, and there’s already been a movie made from it.  That is not damning in and of itself; well structured novels can be easy to adapt to the screen.  I did not come away from it with more than a well structured plot, though.

The characters are all engaging, but none of them has that telling detail that lifts them off the page.  They are all clearly painted enough, and have a personality and motivations.  What they do not have is the spark that moves from them being a collection of facts to a person moving through a world.

This sounds more critical than I intend it.  It is not easy to write a story that coheres as well as this one and that is as genuinely interesting to read.  There is still a hurdle beyond that, though, and Water for Elephants did not clear it for me.

Still, recommended.